Comparison

Wobistro versus a general chatbot

The difference is authorized private sources, limited tools, human approval, and an auditable history.

How the method compares

Method stepWobistroIf you use a general chatbot, verify
SourcesWorks from authorized private sources and preserves the sourceWhere pasted text came from and whether source is preserved
ScopeLimited tools, action prepared within permissionsWhether it can act or only drafts text without permissions
DecisionHuman approval — records the responsible person's decisionWho approves and where that decision is recorded
HistoryEvery result returns to history so next shift starts with contextWhere history lives for the next shift

How it works

Wobistro preserves the source, identifies the exception, prepares an action within permissions, and records the responsible person's decision.

Every result returns to the history so the next shift starts with context.

Try this flow with fictional data.

Try the same exception flow with fictional data.

See it in action

Related: Templates for starting with clean data · Procedures that end in evidence · One exception, one clear decision

Back to comparisons

Frequently asked questions

Does Wobistro decide alone?

No. It prepares an action within permissions and records the responsible person's decision.

Where does the result go?

Every result returns to the history so the next shift starts with context.

How can I test it safely?

Use See it in action with fictional data.

Reviewed

Help & support